The standard

A listing or recommendation should earn its place because it is useful to a traveller, not because a business paid for exposure. That sounds obvious, but it has practical consequences: a famous name is not automatically a good recommendation, and a lesser-known place can be more useful if it solves a real traveller need.

What we check

For attractions, hotels, restaurants and services, we look for the information a visitor actually needs: whether the place is still operating, its current identity and location, how it fits into an itinerary, the realistic trade-offs, and whether important practical details can be supported by a reliable source. For changeable facts, official operator information is preferred over copied directory data.

When direct first-hand experience is not available, the guide should not imply that it is. Research can combine official information, reputable reporting and multiple independent sources, but those are different from personally visiting a venue. The writing should make useful judgements without inventing experiences.

No paid placement

Totally Singapore currently does not sell paid rankings or sponsored placement inside its destination recommendations. If that policy changes in future, commercial material should be disclosed clearly and kept separate from the editorial basis for inclusion.

Closures, rebrands and material changes

A recommendation can become wrong even if the original description was accurate. Businesses close, hotel brands change, attractions renovate and transport access changes. Important recommendations therefore need periodic verification, especially when a page gives the impression that a business is currently operating.

If a venue has closed, the right response depends on the page. A historical or news reference may still be useful with the closure explained. A current “best places” recommendation should normally be removed or rewritten rather than left as if nothing happened.

High-impact practical information gets a higher bar

Immigration, health, legal, safety and financial information can do more harm when wrong. These topics should rely on current authoritative sources and should avoid sweeping statements when the rule depends on nationality, passport type, route, date or personal circumstances. Our Singapore entry guide is an example of that approach.

How corrections work

Useful corrections are welcome through the contact page. A first-party source, current operator notice or specific explanation is especially helpful. The aim is not to preserve old wording for consistency; it is to keep each page as accurate and useful as possible.